Randy Shaw now refusing entry to candidates

See thia post for proof that Jane Kim was in fact campaigning inside non profit SRO builings Jane Kim Campaigning inside non profit SRO buildings

update, according to the manager of one hotel, a recent internal email from Tenderloin Housing Clinic senior property manager, Colleen Carrigan, attempts to clarify that :

1) NO candidate is allowed into the buildings unless signed in by a tenant. And even then a candidate cannot roam the halls even if just hanging door fliers. If any candidate is caught, they will be asked to leave. (of course, two candidates have already gotten in, with some claims they got in via tenants) The only exceptions are census workers with their badge, emergency workers, and PG&E and related (this is also not consistent with what happened in 2006 where THC allowed SEIU members to go door to door knocking on them and get out the vote in a very thinly veiled campaign for Chris Daly) (see this post for the video of the 2006 campaign going door to door

from BeyondChron, just days after the 2006 election
Outreach efforts had been made to SRO tenants in prior elections, but it had never been on such a grand and sophisticated scale. With Daly’s loss a legitimate fear, SEIU stepped up to the plate and conducted a get-out-the-vote operation. Labor organizer Robert Haaland used his vacation time to coordinate this effort (along with three SEIU organizers), and four tenant organizers who work at the Tenderloin Housing Clinic and Conard House (and are members of SEIU) took two weeks of unpaid leave from their jobs with no sick or vacation time accrued – in order to work around the clock for this effort.

2) NO candidates are allowed to leave fliers in the lobby of any of Tenderloin Housing Clinic SRO hotels (this is NOT consistent with other non profits such as TNDC, which does allow candidates to leave fliers in the lobby). It also has nothing to do with the San Francisco SRO uniform hotel visitor policy which was quoted to me as a reason for this. I.E> nowhere in this San Francisco city wide uniform hotel visitor policy does it mention anything about political activities..It’s now considered ‘hands off’ for all non profits including most SRO hotels
probably because of the due diligence of people like H Brown and Bluoz
————-original post———–
from H brown, and it’s all the info so far. We’re asking for names, proof of some kind, video, audio, paper, email, of any refusal by Tenderloin Housing Clinic to allow any candidate in their buildings for the upcoming supervisor elections in San Francisco.
Under federal and city contract rules, non profits must allow access to all candidates if they allow access to one. Non profits cannot favor any single candidate

boys and girls,
Particularly you, Paul Hogarth. I just got this
from a D-6 candidate who was refused access to Shaw’s
buildings while Randy and Paul have given carte blanche
to his carpetbagger candidate, Jane Kim.
It’s all illegal by IRS rules. To keep your tax
exemption you don’t have to stay out of politics. You
just have to promise not to favor one candidate or one
group of candidates which is what Shaw’s group has done
consistently over the years. His Central City SRO
Collaborative just sponsored a forum in which only a
few D-6 candidates were invited (illegal) and now they
won’t let ‘lesser’ candidates have access to their
premises? Also illegal.
Lawyers … the maximum payout in a fine per incident
for these non-profits is $10,000. I have documentation
of nearly a dozen of them violating this law in numerous
gatherings. Are lawyers’ fees on top of that?
Go Giants!
And, Dean … you’ll need to do a deposition so get
details. What buildings? What time? Record calls
to Shaw and Hogarth.
h.
———————————– Original Message ———————————–
Subject: RE: Today’s Land Use Giveaways
From: “Dean Clark”
Date: Mon, October 4, 2010 11:15 am
To: “‘h. brown'”
—————————————————————————————-
Hi H,
You mentioned in an earlier email to let you know if anyone is having
problems entering the THC. We have contacted them several times and cant
seem to get in to do what other candidates have done.
Dean

One note, this last part by H brown is not quite right >> It’s not legal in california to record phone calls..answering machine, yes of course, but not calls, because that’s considered private…no, if Dean is going to record, it needs to be in a common area where people have ‘no reasonable expectation of privacy’…any common areas, like the lobby, hallways, but not in a closed room with randy, for example