In San Francisco, drug addicts in Housing First supportive housing are suing because supportive housing has drug paraphernalia and behaviors associated with drug addicts.
This page is whistleblower case L3WC9M8D8 but has since been expanding (mostly in updates section) since first filing 7.5.24
Far left screenshot is allegations against the non profits in recent lawsuits. Far right screenshot is response by non profits saying that tenants are doing the damages described in the far left screenshot
Simply put, you the taxpayer owe us money because you allowed us to destroy your property
This post centers around recent mass lawsuits filed against some of the top supportive housing non profits in San Francisco
Craig v THC which is the Seneca SRO at 34 6th street, case settled 12.19.25
Borland v THC which is the Jefferson SRO at 440 Eddy-update case settled 6.17.25
Emelia v THC which is the Boyd SRO at 41 Jones. Update 5.5.25 Boyd lawsuit dropped for 12k each – affidavit
Craigie v THC which is the Hartland SRO at 909 Geary
A fifth mass lawsuit was added 12.9.24
Addie v THC which is the Wynton at 445 O’Farrell update case settled 7.10,25
Castle v Greystone, 66 Geary, Tenderloin Housing Clinic, identical to above cases settled 7.21.25
A sixth mass lawsuit has been added 10.28.24 Anderson v THC which is the Garland SRO at 505 O’Farrell. A previous lawsuit Anderson v THC was filed two months earlier for the Baldwin 74 6th street but the tenants were moved to 505 O’Farrell in 2022 and the Baldwin became a shelter run by Five Keys
A seventh mass lawsuit was added 9.10.24 Davis v THC which is the Mission hotel at 505 S Van Ness
Higgenbotham also filed Littlefield v Bayanihan/TODCO 88 6th 10.24.24 case settled 4.17.25 One of the plaintiffs, Tynthia Bouza recently attacked a nearby restaurant owner
involved with drug activity on 6th st
Another mass lawsuit has been filed Anderson v Mercy Housing over 833 Bryant, a new supportive housing building that was in the news recently because of a staff involved shooting and horrific conditions inside the building. This was filed by the same attorney Timothy Kodani that filed the 2016 mass lawsuits below. Text of plaintiffs now added at bottom. update 12.17.25 new 2nd amended complaint filed and one of the plaintiffs, Channell Stewart has been arrested for vehicle theft
update 1.13.26 new mass lawsuit Cross v Episcopal Community Services, Alder hotel 175 6th filed 12.5.25
update 1.14.26 new lawsuit be tenant coordinator Waite v Bryant Law Group filed 1.12.25
update 1.15.26 This is unit 535 Craig v THC after the settlement
update 1.19.26 another mass lawsuit filed, 6.5.25 Morris v Mentone hotel, Episcopal Community Services
update 1.29.26 In home caregiver for tenant coordinator Gary Waite files new lawsuit alleging flesh eating bacteria and mice and roaches 1.26.26
update 2.5.26 brand new mass lawsuit with the Dalt,hotel, Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation Bridges v Dalt hotel
updated 2.6.26, both TODCO cases, Hotel Isabel and Knox hotel are starting to fall apart because some of the plaintiffs have refused to answer questions
by contrast, Tenderloin Housing Clinic never went that far and quickly settled and continue to settle
update 2.6.25 Anderson v 833 Bryant six of the plaintiffs are dead and the attorney knew it
|
this section is updates notifying the non profit they are running an illegal drug house. The PDF also contain information previously posted below about how some tenants that are also plaintiffs (Noel Quintana 621 and Kevin Miller 626) are causing the very damage/drug issues they are suing over update 2.26.26, one of the plaintiffs in Craig v THC and described below in complaints to THC executive director Randy Shaw about drug dealing was, you guess it, arrested again for drug dealing update 11.12.25 response from THC director of property management Zeke Weiner regarding 9.9.25 electronic serve “tenants may use drugs within their units but not in common areas’ Weiner also asks us to show him evidence of drug dealing after we served his boss tons of evidence of drug dealing in the 9.9.25 serve update 11.12.25 notice of lease violation, unauthorized visitors 11.3.25. This is already retaliation and completely made up as I wasn’t even in the Bay Area on 11.3.25. I was in Fairfield and have the receipts to prove it. (manager claims it was a mistake)11.12.25 more videos of drug dealing well after the serves have been done 11.5.25 to 11.11.25 (videos zipped up))–11.30.25—1.2.26—1.29.26 Update 10.26 25 proof of service to Randy Shaw at home in Berkeley with document list and description of service.Previous attempt 10.18.25 at home described wife denying that he lived there update 10.19.25 updated proof of service to manager at 34 6th street This reflects included thumb drive however it was a sub-serve left with front desk staff. It still likely was delivered to the manager update 10.19.25 complete 27 page document that is being served to this non profit This was joined from the previous five PDF and served as 27 pages. Internal reference screen shot for job order update 10.17.25 same papers listed below served on Tabitha Allen, #2 executive at Tenderloin Housing Clinic, the same Tabitha Allen testifying at the HSH Oversight Commission in 2024 about damaged rooms, which is partly what these lawsuits are about, all due to drugs Update 10.10.25 Proof of Service to Randy Shaw at HQ 126 Hyde st, SF. Office rep refused to identify himself then tried to refuse the serve when he opened the package and saw the contents additional documents include the 10.17.24 electronic serve below, 9.9.25 electronic serve, plus cover letter plus this newspaper article about Trumps new executive order, non profits and the federal crackhouse statute update 9.9.25 electronically served via email new serve copy to THC executive director Randy Shaw notifying him of drug use/dealing inside his building plus attachment to 9.9.25 serve copy with links describing 20 years of events related to drug abuse/dealing previous serve copy served 10.17.24 – Update 10.17.24 serve copy sent to Tenderloin Housing Clinic chief executive Randy Shaw about this website and many other violations by some of the plaintiffs |
update 1.13.25 plaintiff Brett Major, 41 Jones arrested for burglary 12.26.25 also serial bike thief 2012
update 1.7.26 on top of suing and collecting settlements for damage that drug addicts themselves cause, the addicts will then steal tools and materials from construction crews which further increases the cost that is billed to the taxpayer. Example, copper piping
update 12.30.25 lead plaintiff in Emelia v THC Boyd already settled Ahndy Emelia arrested 12.9.25 for assault with semi automatic weapon
update 12.18.25 plaintiff Terry Morgan plaintiff in Anderson v THC 505 O’Farrell has been arrested
update 12.17.25 a second 2025 lawsuit involving the Baldwin 74 6th during the 2021 period was dropped recently, possibly settled
update 10.18.25 former tenant coordinator Gary Waite files wrongful termination lawsuit against mass lawsuit attorney Edward Higginbothom and claims he’s drunk on the job
update 9.22.25 former organizer for these mass lawsuits Gary Waite, filed a 2nd amended complaint against mass lawsuit attorney Edward Higginbotham 9.9.25 in which he claims to be in hiding due to threats to his life
Update 10.13.25, Plaintiff Dylan Beers who is suing because there’s crime in the building has been arrested 9.22.25 for burglary
update 10.13.25 SWAT team shows up at Boyd Hotel over a food fight, one of the cases that settled
update 9.13.25 proof that settlement claims are being spent on drugs, plaintiff Eddie Thomas, Winton 445 O’Farrell arrested for drugs at Victoria Draves park in SOMA 8.18.25
In addition, a new article shows that Tenderloin Housing Clinic has among the highest OD death rates The executives in each non profit and the executive of the Homeless department all refused to speak to the press despite these ongoing lawsuits saying that these places are full of drugs, which include plaintiffs being the very people making it a place full of drugs
update 10.12.24 new report by HSH Director Shireen McSpaddden on how insurance costs are 20% higher in PSH due to damages by tenants
Update 8.1.24 camera attacked related to an incident 2 days earlier causing even more damage to the building
Update 8.5.24 despite notifying staff on 8.1.24 with videos via email, the attacks continue, this time trying to torch the camera
update, 833 Bryant a 1st ammended complaint was filed 2.23.25 with more names and new charges
update July 2025, 833 Bryant case has been refiled with corrected names
update 2.25.25 yet another mass lawsuit from the same attorneys with nearly identical allegations including drug dealers in the building at Hotel Isabel at 7th and Mission see Robinson v TODCO
Update 3.12.25, another mass lawsuit involving the Knox SRO at 241 6th st Andrade v Knox
More links and info on X can be found here
Update 11.1.24, new Sunshine Ordinance request reveals multiple people failing DPH inspections due to hoarding/cluttering/rodent infestation, and at least one of them is a plaintiff,. unit 525
Update 10.17.24 serve copy sent to Tenderloin Housing Clinic chief executive Randy Shaw about this website and many other violations by some of the plaintiffs
update 8.28.25, New article and new evidence that three of these buildings, The Mission Hotel, The Seneca hotel and The Jefferson hotel are among the highest for OD death rates (Housing First, Morgue Second)
update 8.18.25 a previous inherited tenant sued Tenderloin Housing Clinic in 2022 alleging drug dealing, prostitution, many of the same allegations in these mass lawsuits, in Thorp v Tenderloin Housing Clinic
Thorp v Tenderloin Housing Clinic is the Wynton hotel, 445 OFarrell which is Addie v THC which just settled. Thorp is not named in the latter suit. He had to drop the 2022 suit after running out of money. He was at the time in contact with The Marina Times about it and could possibly tell if any of the recent plaintiffs were the same people who caused the problems in 2022, which would be fraud. In a related case at the Winton, inherited tenant Richard Chapman sued twice, in 2018 and 2020 over the same allegations that the hotel was a drug house The 2018 lawsuit was by the same attorney Higgenbotham as the 2024 lawsuits. Both lawsuits were settled
update, 8.5.25 attorney in Anderson v 505 O’Farrell gets sanctioned for not showing up
update 5.4.25. The tenant coordinator for most of these mass lawsuits has just filed a first amended complaint that has some pretty wild allegations related to fraud around these lawsuits. Also, a defamation suit was filed by the tenant coordinator and one of the property managers seeks declaratory relief over defamatory statements in a previously dropped lawsuit by the same tenant coordinator. Update 6.27.25 coordinator now suing the attorney update 6.22.25 a state bar complaint was filed by THC property director alleging unethical solicitations according to a motion to strike filed by attorney Mark Fenske
update 7.7.25 Addie v THC Winton parties have agreed to settle and one of the plaintiffs died 5.23.25 months before the lawsuit was filed 12.9.24, then replaced by a successor a year later. Plus numerous grammar errors
update 1.24.25 Early indication the insurance company is starting to fight the case
This type of mass lawsuit is not new. In 2016 a series of similar mass lawsuits were filed starting with Amerson v THC which were widely rumoured to have settled for 5k for each tenant, and most of it spent on drugs. More related lawsuits all filed by the same attorney Timothy Kodani 2016-2017 here, here and here
Many of the allegations were similar habitability issues, failure to repair damaged items, pest infestation things like that. The habitability issues were never repaired and even if they were it’s temporary since the tenants themselves are causing the damage. If the staff were doing this damage that would be contract fraud, or sabotaging the contract in order to inflate the price of the contract. One example from 2016. This is Orvelton Neal who was a plaintiff in the nearly identical Amerson v Tenderloin Housing Clinic
In 2015 Tenderloin Housing Clinic caught him selling crack next to the building and and tried to evict him but later settled. In 2016 he was one of the plaintiffs in that lawsuit Amerson v THC while continuing to sell crack in the alley
Emily Cohen of HSH at the Homeless Oversight Commission 9.7.23 “Emily Cohen of HSH – a large part of the increase in supportive housing funding is for repairing units that ‘have drywall missing-torn down to the studs, floors ripped up. piping tapped into, electric sockets ripped out”
One major difference between 2016 and 2024 is recently the Department of homelessness granted 108mm in extra grant money to Tenderloin Housing Clinic mostly for the purpose of repairing damaged buildings. These type of tenant caused damages were also described in a San Francisco Board of Supervisors hearing on evictions in 2023 here, here, here, and here. Another hearing described the same thing more recently at another Board of Supervisors hearing in March 2024 regarding Homerise Mission Bay here, here and here. This non profit, Tenderloin Housing Clinic has had an official policy of primarily housing ‘chronic substance abusers since at least 2001
Update 7.11.25. a new lawsuit has been filed against the Broadway hotel
But the plaintiff is a meth addict who likely caused the damage per a previous SF Standard article
As pointed out in the article, this private owner takes in the same type of drug addict tenant that city contracted non profits do, but as seen above, the city pays extra to repair that damage. The city attorney sometimes sues private SROs owners over nuisance, but has never sued a contracted non profit for the same reason
This follows an official policy of Harm Reduction and Housing First since at least 2004 and state law since 2016 which was cosponsored by the current city attorney David Chiu and shaped by the executive director of this very same non profit
A major problem with this type of mass lawsuit is if it drags out and goes to trial, it could end up exposing internal documents that show public officials knew the policy of prioritizing high risk addicts would lead to outcomes like this. So the non profit is more likely to settle and pay off the very same addicts with your tax money to keep them quiet
Part of the problem is the newly created HSH Oversight Commission and especially progressives like Christin Evans is putting pressure on HSH to to fill all 800 current vacancies. This puts pressure on non profits to avoid evictions for things like property damage. For example, one of the plaintiffs, Mr Rooney #634 is not being evicted despite unhinging his door over a dozen times and destroying his room. This means there’s no incentive to stop the damage and more incentive to sue over that damage and the more damage there is, the larger the settlement. Only a few members of the Oversight Commission have started questioning what exactly happens when people destroy their units and who’s responsible for things like arson. Also, many of the plaintiffs have recently recently failed habitability inspections by a third party as part of new HSH rules
These lawsuits may have may have been coordinated with the help of the Tenderloin SRO Collaborative, which is incorporated into Tenderloin Housing Clinic according to 990 records and which Shirley Jackson is part of. She was a plaintiff in both the 2016 and 2024 lawsuits. A second person has now been found that appears to be working both sides, a tenant rep and client coordinator with Bryant Law Group, gary waite
There have been other lawsuits against THC but from inherited tenants alleging the same thing. But they don’t know that ‘non residents gaining access to the property’ are usually signed in by HSH funded tenants and then left to roam freely, sometimes for months or even years
One of the charges in these latest lawsuits is that the non profit has lax security which allows non residents into the building bringing mayhem and drug items into the building, but this is one of the plaintiffs, Noel Quintana #621 in Craig v THC
Noel himself signed people into the building who never left and spent more than a year living in his room running a bike chop shop while being on probation after being arrested numerous times for breaking and entering and theft. Noel and his friend also broke down his own door contributing to the dilapidated conditions he’s suing over. Update, one of the longer threads about Noel Quintana and his room damaging is now unrolled on Threadreader app. Thread continues even after being unrolled 10.24.24 2nd unroll of thread for more recent additions. update 10.26.24 Noel621 is in jail again and different people have been accessing his unlocked room, like a person caught beating her own dog in the hallway. Update 10.30.24 question posed to Homeless Oversight Commission member Sharky Laguana “how are unauthorized people able to live in supportive housing for more than a year and the staff doesn’t know about it” Apparently because plaintiffs have been harboring them inside their rooms. Update 11.8.24 long thread on Noel621 updated (threadreader app unable to capture entire thread, more than 100 posts). update 5.24.25 Noel 621 arrested yet again update 6.2.25 see thread, staff caught telling Noel he needs to sign guests in
Another tenant who’s suing, Thomas Rooney #634 continuously destroyed his own room while high on meth and took his own door off the hinges. Another update on Mr Rooney 8.28.24. Update 10.24.24, Mr Rooney set his room on fire tonight. Update 11.15.24 latest photos of Rooney634 room now. Also, the HSH Oversight Commission latest meeting said they would be providing 10k or 700k total to repair damageds units
Another tenant, Kevin Miller #626, is also a meth addict who distributes meth inside the building, and has had regular fights over meth and has tossed meth pipes into the hallway, while starting fires which made the news and caused damage and severely burned one of his guests. Kevin has also been arrested for drugs
Other tenants like Shan Bowerman #616 have arrest records all over the bay area.Update September 2024, Shan Bowerman was arrested again recently Plaintiff and tenant Cameron Combs #414 has been arrested for selling drugs. Plaintiff and tenant William Wyloge #423 has been arrested and made the news for threatening people on the street with a hypodermic needle. Plaintiff Carlos Law #125 has quite a rap sheet. update, Carlos Law was arrested again 8.5.25 Tenant Charles Bursey #135 assaulted a cohabitant in 2017. Jonathan Braddy305 was arrested for robbery just days before this lawsuit was filed room #305 and 207 on LocalcrimNews could be a mismatch or THC simpl,y could have moved him to another room. Plaintiff Melvin Junior #232 (Seneca) was recently arrested for ammunition and drug paraphernalia. Ruben Mesa 603 was recently arrested for possession of narcotics. Michael Hands, plaintiff at the Jefferson has an arrest record all over California
—————-list of plaintiffs OCR converted via ARCHIVE.ORG———–
Multiple parties v Tenderloin Housing Clinic 2024
Craig v THC, 34 6th st, Seneca SRO
THE PARTIES
l. Plaintiff Alice Craig, (“Craig225”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #225 San Francisco, CA, 94103. 34
Sixth Street is a Single Room Occupancy (hereinafter, “SRO”) building at the corner of Sixth
and Market Street in San Francisco (“Premises”).
2; Plaintiff Amanda Nielson, (“Nielson511”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #511, SF, CA, 94103.
3: Plaintiff Anthony Bourne, (“Bourne403”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francsico, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #403, SF, CA, 94103.
- Plaintiff Anthony Young, (“Young120”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #120, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Arthur Kirby, (“Kirby521”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #521, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Billy Wallace, (“Wallace617”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #617, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Bradley Martin, (“Martin132”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #132, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Brian Rogers, (“Rogers628”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #628, SF, CA, 94103.
9, Plaintiff Cameron Combs, (“Combs404”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #404, SF, CA, 94103.
- Plaintiff Carlos Law, (“Law125”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34Sixth Street, Unit #125, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Carrie Snipes, (“Snipes611”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #611, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Charles Bursey, (“Bursey135”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #135, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Christian Valencia, (“Valencia425”’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #425, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Daniel O’ Callaghan, (“O’Callaghan218”’) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #218, SF, CA,
15; Plaintiff David White, (““White102”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #102, SF, CA, 94103.
- Plaintiff, Dominic DeLonge (““DeLonge503”’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #503, SF, CA, 94103.
17; Plaintiff, Dustin Garcia (“Garcia109”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #109, SF, CA, 94103.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
3
- Plaintiff, Dylan Beers (“Beers412”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #412, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Eric Jackson, (“Jackson428”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #428, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Fawn Galloway-Dean (“Galloway229”) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #229, SF, CA,
PAM Plaintiff Fernando Estrada Ruiz, (“Estrada614’) is an individual and current tenant withi
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #614, SF, CA, 94103.
- Plaintiff Frederick Beasley, (“Beasley114’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #114, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff George Graves, (““Graves525”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit # 525, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Gilberto Vererra, (“Vererra311”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #311, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Gregory Murray, (“Murray515”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #515, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Gregory Zuuiga, (“Zuuiga512”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #512, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff James Stuart, (“Stuart128”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit # 128, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff James Truitt, (“Truitt524’’) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #524, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Jeremy Ramirez, (“Ramirez115”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #115, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Jody Morrow, (“Morrow533”’) is an individual and current tenant within the Cit
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #533, SF, CA, 94103.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- Plaintiff Jonathan Braddy, (“Braddy305”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #305, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Jose Saucedo, (“Saucedo41 1”) is an individual and current tenant within the Cit
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #411, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Kenneth Sagar, (“Sagar301”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #301, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Kevin Masiell, (‘Masiell532”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #532, SF, CA, 94103.
35: Plaintiff Kevin Miller, (“Miller626”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #626, SF, CA, 94103.
- Plaintiff Kimberly Milhorn, (“Millhorn303”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #303, SF, CA, 94103.
a7; Plaintiff Kip Corrigan, (“Corrigan505”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #505, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Leonard Carr, (“Carr528”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #528, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Leonardo Gonzalliz, (“Gonzalliz504”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #504, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Le Star Russell, (“Russell309”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and formally lived at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #309, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Melissa O’ Callaghan, (“O’Callaghan535”’) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #535, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Melvin Junior, (“Junior232”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #232, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Michael Chaplin, (“Chaplin606”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #606, SF, CA, 94103.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- Plaintiff Milton Feliciano Jr., (“Feliciano407”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #407, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Noel Quintana, (“Quintana621”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #621, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Pablo De Castro, (“De Castro529”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #529, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Raford Houston, (“Houston502”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #502, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Ramona Penikila, (““Penikila604’’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #604, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Rena Junior, (““Rena203”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #203, SF, CA 94103. - Plaintiff Richard Gatenbein, (“Gatenbein426”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #426, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Richard Moss, (“Moss302”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #302, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Ricki Nunes, (“Nunes615”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and formally lived at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #615, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Roger Tims, (“Tims526”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #526, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Ruben Mesa, (“Mesa603”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #603, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Russell Warner, (“Warner223”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #223, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Shan Bowerman, (“Bowerman616”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #616, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Siobhon Kelly, (“Kelly217”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #217, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Shirley Jackson, (“Jackson215”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #215, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Sonia Pitambar, (“Pitambar308”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #308, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Steven Dsmuke, (“Dsmuke321”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #321, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Stewart Slaughter, (“Slaughter134’’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #134, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Terry Hicks, (“Hicks618”) is an individual and current tenant within the City an
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #618, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Vincent “Veronica” Soto, (“Soto514’’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #514, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff William Wyloge, (“Wyloge423”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #423, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Andrew Hightower, (“Hightower522”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #522, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Thomas Rooney, (“Rooney634’”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #634, SF, CA, 94103. - Plaintiff Zachary McVay, (“McVay435”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #435, SF, CA, 94103. - Debra Osibit, (“Osibit304”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 34 Sixth Street, Unit #304, SF, CA, 94103. - Defendant 32-40 6″ Street, LLC, (“LLC”) has been the property owner of the Premises a
all times relevant to this Complaint. - Defendant Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., (“THC”) has been the property manager for
the Premises at all times relevant to the Complaint.
71, The true names and capacities of the Defendants sued as Does are unknown to Plaintiffs.
Once Plaintiffs became aware of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued as Does,
Borland v THC 440 Eddy, Jefferson SRO
l. Plaintiff Brian Borland, (“Borland110”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #110 San Francisco, CA,
- 440 Eddy Street is a Single Room Occupancy ( “SRO”’) building at the corner of Eddy
and Leavenworth Street in San Francisco (“Premises”).
2: Plaintiff Daniel Harris, (“Harris121”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #121, SF, CA, 94102.
- Plaintiff Douglas Flemming, (“Flemming304’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francsico, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #304, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Jason Vest, (“Vest302”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #302, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Joseph Atchan, (“Atchan314”) is an individual and current tenant within the Cit
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #314, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Julio Valle, (“Valle104’’) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #104, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Katilyn Lanphear, (“Lanphear509”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #509, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Kayla Watson, (““Watson418”) is an individual and current tenant within the Cit
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #418, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Mark Dasccnzo, (““Dasccnzo0415) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #415, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Michael Hands, (“Hands323”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #323, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Michael Ramirez, (“Ramirez316’’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #316, SF, CA, 94102.
12, Plaintiff Quentin Williams, (“Williams422”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #422, SF, CA, 94102.
- Plaintiff Ryan Latimer, (“Latimer409”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 440 Eddy Street, Unit #409, SF, CA, 94102.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Emelia v THC 41 Jones, Boyd SRO
THE PARTIES
l. Plaintiff Ahndy Emelia, (“Emelia510”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit 510 San Francisco, CA, 94102. 41 Jones Street
is a SRO building at the corners of Jones and McAllister Street in San Francisco, (“Premises”).
2: Plaintiff Amie Havener, (“Havener214”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #214, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
3; Plaintiff Andrew Cross, (“Cross409”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francsico, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #409, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
- Plaintiff Barbara Palmer, (“Palmer305”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #305, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Brett J Major, (“Major607”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #607, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Charles Beavers, (“Beavers406”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #406, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Darien Black, (“Black312”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #212, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Efren Echi, (“Echi514”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #514, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
9; Plaintiff Erica Stewart, (“Stewart408”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #408, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Federico Mustelier, (“Mustelier706”) is a current resident of the City and Count
of San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #706, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Fred Plate, (“Plate508”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #508, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Gary Barker, (“Barker511”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #511, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
2
- Plaintiff James Holland, (“Holland615”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #615, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff, Jeffrey Egbert (“Egbert306”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #306, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff, Jonathan Ellis (“Ellis315”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #315, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff, Jose A. Ortega (“Ortega509”) is a current resident of the City and County of Sa
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #509, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Justin Gonsalves, (“Gonsalves701”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #701, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Lafayette Turner (“Turner403”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #403, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Lavonda Myles, (“Myles215”) is a current resident of the City and County of Sa
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #215, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Lloyd Raynor, (“Raynor405”) is a current resident of the City and County of San|
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #405, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
ZA. Plaintiff Mark Martins, (“Martins411”) is a current resident of the City and County of Sa
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit # 411, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
- Plaintiff Michael Edgar, (“Edgar601”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #601, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Nicholas Hoffman, (“Hoffman201”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #201, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Raymie L. Brown, (“Brown604”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #604, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Roy Robinson, (“Robinson412”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #412, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Sean Harper, (“Harper505”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #505, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- Plaintiff Tanya Carrillo, (“Carrillo314”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #314, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Tiffany Curry, (“Curry208”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #208, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Todd Geffre, (“Geffre404”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and formerly lived at 41 Jones Street, Unit #404, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff William Foster, (“Foster512”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #512, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff William Truitt, (“Truitt515”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #515, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Willie Joyce, (“Joyce703”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #703, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Mahi Newberry, (“Newberry704”) is a current resident of the City and County o
San Francisco, and lives at 41 Jones Street, Unit #704, San Francisco, CA, 94102. - Defendant Boyd Hotel, LLC, (“LLC”) is the property owner of the subject premises at all
time herein.
Craigie v THC 909 Geary, Hartland SRO
THE PARTIES
l. Plaintiff Allan Craigie, (“Craigie507”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #507 San Francisco, CA,
- 909 Geary Street is a Single Room Occupancy Multi Use (hereinafter, “SRO”) building
with attached convenient store at the corner of Geary & Larkin Street in San Francisco
(“Premises”). - Plaintiff Carl Applon, (“Applon318”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #318, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Charles Nola, (“Nola322”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #322, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Cheryl Anderson, (“Anderson423”’) is an individual and current tenant within th
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #423, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Daniel Hoggs, (“Hoggs410”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #410, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Deborah Jones, (“Jones306”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #306, SF, CA, 94109.
e Plaintiff Deborah Jones (“Jones412”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #412, SF, CA, 94109.
- Plaintiff Duvonce Bean, (“Bean315”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #315, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Ezra Rogers, (“Rogers205”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street Unit #205, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Karen Vanderwal, (“Vanderwal604’) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #604, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Kham Phady, (“Phady309”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street Street, Unit #309, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Lawrence Hollins, (“Hollins427’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #427, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Manuel Randle, (““Randle308”’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #308, SF, CA, 94109.
- Plaintiff Mc Cranie French, (“French317”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #317, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Paige Adams, (“Adams606”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #606, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff, Rickey Dial (“Dial418”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #418, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff, Sharon Ducksworth (“Ducksworth614”) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #614, SF, CA, - Plaintiff, Shuntae Williams (“Willimas415”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #415, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff William Martin, (“Martin514’’) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #514, SF, CA, 94109. - Plaintiff Gina Villar (“Villar315”’) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 909 Geary Street, Unit #315, SF, CA, 94109. - Defendant 909 Geary Street, LLC, (“LLC”) has been the property owner of the Premises
at all times relevant to this Complaint. - Defendant Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., (“TLC”) has been the property manager for
the Premises at all times relevant to the Complaint.
Wynton Hotel, 445 O’Farrell added 12.9.24
THE PARTIES
- Plaintiff EMILY ADDIE, at all relevant times was a resident of The Winton Hotel
located at 445 O’Farrell Street, San Francisco, California 94102 (hereinafter “WINTON
HOTEL”) in Unit 203, from April 2024 to the present. - Plaintiff MARIA CHRISTIANA BENDANA, at all relevant times was a resident of the
WINTON HOTEL in Unit 227, from August 2023 to present. - Plaintiff JESSICA BENSON, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 422, from 2017 through 2022. - Plaintiff KEVIN DEFILIPPO, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 406, from August 2024 to the present. - Plaintiff LEMONIER DILLARD, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 204, from August 2023 to the present. - Plaintiff JAMES DUFFY, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON HOTEL in
Unit 217, from 2019 to the present. - Plaintiff DANIELLE EDWARDS, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 208, from August 2021 to the present. - Plaintiff ANTHONY FORD, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 223, from March 2003 to the present. - Plaintiff MICHELLE GUIDISH, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 216, from August 2020 to the present. - Plaintiff WALLACE HARRIS, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 226, from 2009 to the present.
Complaint for Damages
Addie, et al. v. Winton Hotel, et. al.
- Plaintiff CARLOS HERNANDEZ, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 308, from 2019 to the present. - Plaintiff LONNIE HOLDEN, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 321, from February 2024 to the present. - Plaintiff MAGEB HUSSAIN, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 314, from 2021 to the present. - Plaintiff THOMAS ISAAC, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON HOTEL
in Unit 311, from August 2020 to the present. - Plaintiff STEPHANIE LAUREN HUSTON, at all relevant times was a resident of the
WINTON HOTEL in Unit 211, from September 2024 to the present. - Plaintiff NICHOLAS JACOBS, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 215, from December 2022 to the present. - Plaintiff MICHAEL KELLOUGH, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 400, from 1997 to the present. - Plaintiff JEFFREY MACK, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON HOTEL
in Unit 415, from 2022 to the present. - Plaintiff JANIE SUE MACLIN, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 322, from August 2023 to the present. - Plaintiff SHAWAN PAUL MACLIN, at all relevant times was a resident of the
WINTON HOTEL in Unit 322, from August 2023 to the present. - Plaintiff VANESSA JOE MOORE, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 212, from August 2023 to the present. - Plaintiff JOHN NELSON, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON HOTEL in
Unit 423, from 2021 to the present. - Plaintiff PATRICIA ODERIO-COVETTI, at all relevant times was a resident of the
WINTON HOTEL in Unit 306, from February 2020 to the present. - Plaintiff RYAN PALMER, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON HOTEL
in Unit 316, from 2021 to 2023.
Complaint for Damages
Addie, et al. v. Winton Hotel, et. al.
- Plaintiff SHAWANA REED, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 219, from January 2020 to the present. - Plaintiff MIA I. SALVAGGIO, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 201, from October 2023 to the present. - Plaintiff EDDIE THOMAS III, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 228, from 2019 to the present. - Plaintiff NICHOLAS THOMAS, JR., at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 229, from 2018 to the present. - Plaintiff ROBERT C. VELA JR., at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 218, from September 2022 to the present. - Plaintiff DANITA WILLIAMS, at all relevant times was a resident of the WINTON
HOTEL in Unit 202, from 2019 to the present
Garland hotel plaintiffs, 505 O’Farrell, filed 10.28.24
- Plaintiff Angel Anderson, (“Anderson608”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #608 San Francisco,
CA, 94102. 909 Geary Street is a Single Room Occupancy Multi Use (hereinafter, “SRO”)
building at the corner of O’Farrell & Jones Street in San Francisco (“Premises”). - Plaintiff Carol Prows, (“Prows602”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #602, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Christy McKinney, (“McKinney215”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #215, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Corey Niederhauser, (“Niederhauser508”) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #508, SF,
CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Darrick Taylor, (“Taylor311”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #311, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Eric Cornute, (“Cornute505”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #505, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff John Dwyer (“Dwyer209”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #209, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Keith Kelly, (“Kelly217”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #217, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Michael Knutson, (“Knutson308”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street Unit #308, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Molique Frank, (“Frank212”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #212, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Nicole Borras, (“Borras609”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street Street, Unit #505, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Paul Brown, (“Brown409”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #409, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Robert Carty, (“Carty517”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #517, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Stacy Elliot, (“Elliott503”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #503, SF, CA, 94102. - Plaintiff Terry Morgan, (“Morgan605”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 505 O’Farrell Street, Unit #605, SF, CA, 94102.
Mission Hotel, Davis v THC plaintiffs
Plaintiff Cepheus Davis, (“Davis387”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #387 San Francisco, CA,
- 520 S. Van Ness Street is a Single Room Occupancy (hereinafter, “SRO”) building at the
corner of South Van Ness and 16th Street in San Francisco (“Premises”). - Plaintiff Charles Gardner, (“Gardner248”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #248, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Cheryl Howard, (“Howard299”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francsico, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #299, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Curtis Seaver, (“Seaver216”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #216, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Donald Doss, (“Doss318”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #318, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Duane Fields, (“Fields133”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #133, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Francis Lennon, (“Lennon148”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #148, SF, CA, - Plaintiff IM Parsons, (“Parsons319”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #319, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Imelda Penate, (“Penate320”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street Unit #320, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Israel Williams, (“Williams373”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #125, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Jennifer Lynn Haun, (“Haun373”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #373, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Joni Perkins, (“Perkins156”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #156, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Latricia Jackson, (“Jackson328”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #328, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Louise Irish, (“Irish108”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #108, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Lynicia Thomas, (“Thomas148”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #148, SF, CA, - Plaintiff, Mario Pena (“Pena289”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #289, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff, Matthew Warner (“Warner359”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #359, SF, CA, - Plaintiff, Michaela Nickerson (“Nickerson207”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #207, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Michelle Green, (“Green315”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #315, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Nathaniel Kelly (“Kelly327”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #327, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Quinton Buttars, (“Buttars207”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #207, SF, CA,
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
4
- Plaintiff Quinzo Collins, (“Collins392”) is an individual and current tenant within the
City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #392, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Roger Basso, (“Basso126”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #126, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Sammy Sterio, (“Sterio150”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #150, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Terry Lane, (“Lane351”) is an individual and current tenant within the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #351, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Tyrone Shingledecker, (“Shingledecker325”) is an individual and current tenant
within the City and County of San Francisco, and formally lived at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #325 - Plaintiff Carolos Hernandez, (“Hernandez361”) is an individual and current tenant within
the City and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit # 361, SF, CA, - Plaintiff Michael Rose, (“Rose391”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and lives at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #391, SF, CA, 94110. - Plaintiff Laura Rumbo, (“Rumbo314”) is an individual and current tenant within the City
and County of San Francisco, and formally lived at 520 S. Van Ness Street, Unit #314, SF, CA,
Anderson v Mercy Housing 833 Bryant plaintiff list
Plaintiff CURTIS’ANDERSON moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises.
• 17. Plaintiff TERRENCE BANKS moved into the subject premises, had paid
4
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
r
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises.
- Plaintiff IRMA BRADLEYSHAW moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least .thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff AARON BRUNDIGE moyed into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff CHRISTINA CARDOZA moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff JOHNNY CRAWFORD moved into the subject premises and
had remained a known resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus.a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff PAMELA DARDEN moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff TOMI DAVIS moved into the subject premises, had paid rent,
and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of said
premises. . - Plaintiff TONY DELEMA moved into the subject premises, had paid
.rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises.
- Plaintiff DIEGO DURAN moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two(32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff DONA ELDERS moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff JAIME FAALOGOIFO moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff STEVEN FERGUSON moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent,. and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff SITYLENE FLORES moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff AL• EGRA FREEMAN moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff FRED GORTON moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least•thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of - Plaintiff SELESTINE GRAHAM moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff BELTRAN GEMORA moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises.
- Plaintiff JASON GREATHOUS.E moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - . Plaintiff AMANDA HINKLE moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff REGINALD HUGHES moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff ROBERT HURLEY moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff SPENCINA JACKSON moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a residenf for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises.
•39. Plaintiff SHANTE JOHNSON moved into the subject premises, had paid
7
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff SEAN KEYOTE moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff MANUEL METCALF moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff ERIC MOSS moved into the subject premises, had paid rent,
and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a:tenant of said
premises. - Plaintiff STEPHEN PERRY moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) dayand is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff ROBERT PORTER moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff STANLEY PROCTOR moved into the subjectpremises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. ‘ ‘ - Plaintiff JAVIER RAMIREZ•nioved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
8
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
said premises. - Plaintiff YOLANDA REED moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff TIMOTHY REILLY moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty7two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff JACKIE ROBINSON moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff AUBIN SCOTLAND moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at.least thirty-two (32) day and i s
thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff JIM SMITH moved into the subject premises, had paid rent, and
had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32).day and is thus a tenant of said
premises. - Plaintiff MISAMI SMITH moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff MARK SUTTON moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of said premises - Plaintiff EMORY TAYLOR moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff FREDDY TAYLOR moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises.
- Plaintiff NICHOLE THIERRY moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - ‘ Plaintiff ANGELA UNDERWOOD moved into the subject premises,
had paid rent, and had remained a resident for’at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff RUBIN VILLAREAL moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff BRYAN WHILEY. moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff CASSANDRA WYATT moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at .least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
833 Bryant 1st amended more names added
- Plaintiff SHAWN BUCKMASTER moved into the subject premises, had
10 .
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises. - Plaintiff MATTHEW BYRD moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff MICHAEL HEALY moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises.
- Plaintiff ROBIN KIMBALL moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff ELAINE LUNA moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff LESLIE MALLO moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, arid had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff DAWSON MAYS moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. . - Plaintiff MARCUS McNEALEY moved into the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
11
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
tenant of said premises.
- Plaintiff ELAINE NIAMATA moved into the subject, premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff SIDNEY POPE moved into the subject premises, had paid rent,
and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of said
premises. - Plaintiff JASON QUINONES moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff MARTHA REYES moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant - Plaintiff MANUEL RUBIN moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - . Plaintiff MORRIS SYLVE moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had •remained a resident for at least thirty-two(32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff SHANNELL STEWART moved into’ the subject premises, had
paid rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a
tenant of said premises.
12
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - Plaintiff LARRY THOMAS moved into the subject premises, had paid
rent, and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of
said premises. - Plaintiff SAM WOLF moved into the subject premises, had paid rent,
and had remained a resident for at least thirty-two (32) day and is thus a tenant of said
premises
Robinson v TODCO filed 2.24.25 plaintiff list
Complaint for Damages
Robinson, et al. v. Eberling, et. al.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
- This Court is the proper court because the subject of this action occurred exclusively
within the jurisdictional area of the City and County of San Francisco. - Further, PLAINTIFFS’ damages were suffered exclusively within the jurisdictional area
of the City and County of San Francisco. - Further, each Plaintiff suffered harms in excess of the jurisdiction of this Court.
THE PARTIES - Plaintiff PATRICIA ROBINSON, at all relevant times was a tenant of the premises
located at 1095 Mission Street, San Francisco, California 94103 (hereinafter “HOTEL
ISABEL”) in Unit 308. - Plaintiff ANTHONY ROBINSON, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL
ISABEL in Unit 300. - Plaintiff MONIKA BARNETT, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL
in Unit 310. - Plaintiffs LAURA BENN AND TONY BENN, at all relevant times were tenants of the
HOTEL ISABEL in Unit 408. - Plaintiff WANDA ROSS, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL in
Unit 509. - Plaintiff ANGELA KELLUM, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL
in Unit 203. - Plaintiff RANDY CHAU, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL in
Unit 205. - Plaintiff DESHAY DORHAN, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL
in Unit 412. - Plaintiff ANGELIQUE MAYWEATHER, at all relevant times was a tenant of the
HOTEL ISABEL in Unit 400. - Plaintiff JESSE GREENBERG, at all relevant times was a tenant of the HOTEL ISABEL
in Unit 407.
————————————————– Cross v Episcopal Community Services, Alder hotel 175 6th filed 12.5.25
Complaint for Damages
Cross v. Alder Hotel LLC, et al.
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Delray Cross, (“Cross424”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 424 San Francisco, CA, 94103.
2. Plaintiff Wali Daggao, (“Daggao214 “) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 214 San Francisco, CA, 94103.
3. Plaintiff Eugene Dosier, (“Dosier405”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 405 San Francisco, CA, 94103.
4. Plaintiff Emily Flannery, (“Flannery402”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 402, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
5. Plaintiff Wayne Foote (“Foote504”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 504, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
6. Plaintiff Rebecca Garza, (“Garza515”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 515, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
7. Plaintiff Sean Hurt (“Hurt415”) was formerly a resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, living at 175 6th Street, Apt. 415, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
8. Plaintiff Jamal Ibrahim, (“Ibrahim412”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.412, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
9. Plaintiff Elijah Mansker, (“Mansker332”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.332, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
10. Plaintiff Janessa Moreno, (“Moreno324”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.324, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
11. Plaintiff Katrina Newsome, (“Newsome409”) is a former resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.409, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
12. Plaintiff Shawna Owens, (“Owens233”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt. 233, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
13. Plaintiff Katie Peralta, (“Peralta407”) was formerly a resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, living at 175 6th Street, Apt. 407, San Francisco, CA, 94103
Complaint for Damages
Cross v. Alder Hotel LLC, et al.
14. Plaintiff Ronald Roberts, (“Roberts307”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt 307., San Francisco, CA, 94103.
15. Plaintiff Michael Vice (“Vice211”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.211, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
16. Plaintiff Emil Win (“Win322”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.322, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
17. Plaintiff Terrance White (“White423”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.423, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
18. Plaintiff Eden Libby (“Libby313”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.313, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
19. Plaintiff Janania Calhoun (“Calhoun519”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.519, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
20. Plaintiff Matthew Erickson (“Erickson309”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.309, San Francisco, CA, 94103.
21. Plaintiff Sean Braimes (“Braimes403”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 175 6th Street, Apt.403, San Francisco, CA, 94103.\
——————————————Mentone hotel, Morris v Episcopal Community Services——————-
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
2
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Amber Morris, (“Amber602”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit 602 San Francisco, CA, 94102. 387 Ellis Street is a
SRO building in San Francisco, better known as the Menton Hotel. (“Premises”).
2. Plaintiff Andre Jubert, (“Andre516”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #516, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
3. Plaintiff Anthony Kelly, (“Kelly505”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francsico, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #505, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
4. Plaintiff Asia Tillery, (“Asia215”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #215, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
5. Plaintiff Barry Hewett, (“Barry305”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #305, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
6. Plaintiff Bettina Mateo, (“Bettina304”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #304, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
7. Plaintiff Bret Bengston, (“Brett602”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #602, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
8. Plaintiff Christian Andreasen, (“Christian507”) is a current resident of the City and
County of San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #507, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
9. Plaintiff Clayton Johnson, (“Clayton503”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #503, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
10. Plaintiff Deborah Smith, (“Deborah416”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #416, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
11. Plaintiff Delilah Soto, (“Delilah610”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #610, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
12. Plaintiff Delonzo Gallon, (“Delonzo410”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #410, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
1
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
3
13. Plaintiff Jacob Anderson, (“Jacob405”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #405, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
14. Plaintiff Jason Bartosavage (“Jason312”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #312, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
15. Plaintiff Johnathan Coran, (“Johnathan604”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #604, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
16. Plaintiff, Joshua Cash (“Cash414”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #414, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
17. Plaintiff, Lisa Pelletier-Ross (“Lisa615”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #615, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
18. Plaintiff, Lonnie Webster (“Lonnie 403”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #403, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
19. Plaintiff Mohamed Kouta, (“Mohamed616”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #616, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
20. Plaintiff Nickolian Lee (“Lee211”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #211, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
21. Plaintiff Raquel Anderson, (“Raquel610”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #610, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
22. Plaintiff Richard Rainville, (“Richard608”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #608, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
23. Plaintiff Ruby Henderson, (“Henderson611”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit # 611, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
24. Plaintiff Sierra Spraggins, (“Spraggins501”) is a current resident of the City and County
of San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #501, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
25. Plaintiff Stacey Garvin, (“Stacey504”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #504, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
26. Plaintiff Trever Stewart, (“Trever301”) is a current resident of the City and County of
San Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit #301, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
4
27. Plaintiff Troy Wehrli, (“Troy302”) is a current resident of the City and County of San
Francisco, and lives at 387 Ellis Street, Unit # 302, San Francisco, CA, 94102.
28. Defendant Menton Hotel, LLC, (“LLC”) is the property owner of the subject premises at
all time herein.
29. Defendant Episcopal Community Services., (“THC”) is the property manager for the
subject premises at all times herein.